By: SeekTU_buckeye

SeekTU_buckeye
Sat, 25 Apr 2015 02:37:10 +0000

Due Process – Based on employee contract – Dismissed (at-will employee)

Due Process – Based on liberty interest – Dismissed (was not stigmatized by Glaros report, and did not take advantage of name clearing hearing)

Due Process – Based on substantive due process – Dismissed (was not a scapegoat for Title IX)

We are left with one item that the Judge allowed to go forward. Does not mean he will win, simply means the other three had no legal merits. Now Mr. Waters is faced with the option that he can attempt to sue, because he wasn’t treated like a cheerleader. There are going to be enough differences between the cheerleader situation and this situation to show plenty of reasons for dismissal that had nothing to do with gender.

I hope Mr. Waters can get a refund on his attorney fees.