By: Anon

Anon
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:03:46 +0000

”
Danielle is simply saying she thinks there should be improved lifestyle of OSU students on campus, smarter hires in faculty, aggressive seeking out of research opportunities, more aid in job searches before and after graduation, and more support for already successful departments and improvement for those departments that need it. Makes sense to me. ”

But Danielle did not say that. Danielle only looked at the negative aspects and did not make suggestions. Really this was just an insulting article to the progress of this institution and that is why this is an incredibly poorly written article. It saddens me that the school newspaper chooses such poor writers who lack critical thought and analytical skills.